InVideo vs Pika
InVideo is an AI video creator with generative video models and an online editor; Pika is an AI video generator with credit plans for video and image models. Pika is cheaper to start: Pika Starter costs USD 10 a month, InVideo Starter USD 20 per seat a month.
Choose InVideo for marketers who generate many short video variants, and Pika for creators who generate short AI video shots for social media. If you need websites, web apps and mobile apps as well, Siteglade, an autonomous AI agent with its own computer in the cloud, is a third option.
A note on who wrote this: Siteglade publishes this comparison, and every fact about another product is taken from that product's pages as they read on October 27, 2026.
The comparison in one table
The table compares without ranking: each cell comes from the product's own pages, and "Not listed" means the pricing page is silent on it.
| InVideo | Pika | Siteglade | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paid plans | Starter USD 20 per seat a month; Plus USD 60 per seat a month; Max USD 150 per seat a month | Starter USD 10 a month; Creator USD 35 a month; Fancy from USD 95 a month | Pro USD 14.99, Plus USD 34.99, Max USD 69.99 a month |
| Free plan | Not stated | A Free plan without monthly credits, where you buy credit packs | Free plan with 1,500 credits a month and 3 projects |
| Images | Not listed | Yes | Yes |
| Videos | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What sets InVideo and Pika apart
InVideo and Pika are both AI video tools, so they compete for the same job. Both InVideo and Pika list videos. Only Pika lists images. Only Pika lists a free option, a Free plan without monthly credits, where you buy credit packs; the pricing page of InVideo does not mention one. InVideo prices some plans per seat, so its cost grows with the team, while every plan Pika lists has one price.
Pricing: InVideo vs Pika
InVideo's paid plans: Starter USD 20 per seat a month (400 credits a month); Plus USD 60 per seat a month (2,000 credits a month) and Max USD 150 per seat a month (5,000 credits a month).
Pika's paid plans: Starter USD 10 a month (900 credits a month); Creator USD 35 a month (3,150 credits a month) and Fancy from USD 95 a month (8,550 credits a month). Pika sells credits for single video and image generations, so a finished video with a script, a voice and captions is up to you.
Credits are counted differently by each product, so run one real task in both before you decide.
Where InVideo is stronger
Yearly billing halves the monthly price. Plus and Max include guest seats and the InVideo editor. Max includes 5,000 credits per seat a month.
Where Pika is stronger
Yearly billing saves 20%. The pricing page estimates how many credits a month of your videos and images needs.
A third option: Siteglade
Neither InVideo nor Pika lists websites, web apps, mobile apps and desktop apps on its pricing page. Siteglade does. It plans the pages, designs them, writes the copy and builds a real website you can edit by clicking, then publishes it to a free siteglade.page address or, from Pro, your own domain.
Where Pika generates the shots, Siteglade makes the whole video: it writes the script, adds a voice-over and word-by-word captions and edits the shots on a timeline. Every task runs in a sandbox on servers in the EU, and code can be exported on every plan.
Frequently asked questions
Is InVideo better than Pika?
Neither is better for everything. InVideo suits marketers who generate many short video variants; Pika suits creators who generate short AI video shots for social media.
Which is cheaper, InVideo or Pika?
Pika is cheaper to start: Pika Starter costs USD 10 a month, InVideo Starter USD 20 per seat a month.
Is there an alternative to both InVideo and Pika?
Siteglade, an autonomous AI agent with its own computer in the cloud. It delivers websites, web apps, mobile apps and desktop apps as well, with a Free plan with 1,500 credits a month and 3 projects.